International Journal of Human Rights Law Review

International Open Access Double Blind Peer Reviewed, Referred Journal

ISSN No. : 2583-7095

Consent in Medical Treatment in India: Ethical and Legal Perspectives

Consent forms the ethical and legal cornerstone of medical practice, reflecting respect for patient autonomy and the right to self-determination. In the Indian context, consent in medical treatment is governed by a combination of statutory provisions, constitutional principles, ethical guidelines, and judicial interpretations. This article examines the concept of consent with particular emphasis on its […]

A Review of Sikkim Succession Act, 2008: A Human Rights Perspective

Sikkim’s unique constitutional status under Article 371F allows for the preservation of old laws and customs. However, this often creates a conflict with Part III of the Indian Constitution. The Sikkim Succession Act, 2008 was considered as a positive move towards codifying property rights in a state governed by customary laws. While it aimed to […]

India’s Journey Towards Becoming a Global Arbitration Hub with Special Reference to Institutional Growth and International Credibility

The Indian arbitration ecosystem has undergone revolutionary evolution through purposive institutional development, progressive legislative amendments, and judicial restraint, positioning the country to emerge as a global arbitration hub, similar to Singapore, London, and Hong Kong. The exponential growth of flagship arbitration institutions like NDIAC, MCIA, and DIAC saw MCIA report a 48% increase in caseloads […]

Bail as a Human Right: A Critical Examination of Bail Reforms under BNSS

Bail occupies a pivotal position in the criminal justice system, mediating the State’s coercive power to arrest and detain against the constitutional presumption of innocence and the protection of personal liberty. Traditionally perceived as a procedural mechanism to secure the presence of the accused at trial, bail has, through evolving constitutional jurisprudence, acquired the character […]

The Constitutional Duty to Forget: Indefinite State Retention of Personal Data After Puttaswamy, NATGRID, and the Personal Data Protection Act, 2023

The acknowledgement of informational privacy by the Supreme Court in Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.). v. Union of India suggests the positive duty of being able to forget personal information implicitly after the initial purpose of such information is satisfied. However, the Central Identities Data Repository (Aadhaar), CCTNS, NATGRID and the Central Monitoring System will have […]